Saturday, May 4, 2013

Democracy Quo Vadis?

Wikipedia defines democracy as "a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives. Democracy allows eligible citizens to participate equally—either directly or through elected representatives—in the proposal, development, and creation of laws. It encompasses social, economic and cultural conditions that enable the free and equal practice of political self-determination."

Many countries that follow a democratic form of government feel that they are innately superior to more autocratic or totalitarian regimes. India is no exception. Indians are inordinately proud of their colourful, noisy, pluralistic and generally chaotic democracy.

The fact is that in reality, most Indians live in systems that are anything but democratic.

At birth, Indians step into their place into the 'Indian Family'. This is hardly democratic! There is either a stern, old fashioned father who is a terror and a domestic despot or a mother whose word is law. The child's first exposure to the world is to an autocratic system which has strict rules of precedence, respect and obedience.

At around 5 or 6 years of age he enters school. Again a totalitarian state to say the least! The Principal is God incarnate and the teachers enforce discipline with an iron hand. The class prefect or monitor represents authority that cannot be transgressed. He has to conform to the rules and has very little control over his own destiny. A far cry from democracy!

After school there is a faint glimmer of hope. He goes to college where discipline and enforcement are relatively lax. Here is is first chance to 'rebel' and to look for opportunities where he can express himself. Unfortunately the respite is all to short.

Within a few years, he takes up a job. Whether it is in the Public Sector, Private Sector or even the Government, there is a strict hierarchical system. Rules of procedure, convention and deference to one's seniors have to be followed diligently. Deviation is frowned upon. Again the environment is hardly democratic.

Given this structure, it is perhaps surprising that there is such a maudlin longing for democracy in public affairs. In reality, elections and the will of the people are just a means to the end. Politicians, power brokers and others in the murky world of public governance use democracy only as a cover. Vote banks are bought and sold and the final structure that emerges is just as autocratic and centrally driven as any totalitarian regime.

The fact is that Indians are uncomfortable with true democracy. We have not lived in democratic structures and it is unlikely that a cleansing of the political system will happen anytime soon. We are searching for a 'strong' leader - is that merely a euphemism for an authoritarian set up?  

4 comments:

  1. Interesting reflective post as always. Democracy is about the political governance system and how it is managed. People should be able to chose and replace government through free and fair elections, they should be able to actively participate as citizens in politics and civic life, they get protection and rule of law applies to all.

    Families, government and commercial organizations are generally autocratic in nature. The degree of respect given to individuals may vary - the boss is still the boss!

    India's experiment is democracy is in its early stage transitioning from as you say from a very autocratic and feudalistic society, where individual identity is not encouraged. It may take some time for the people to understand their rights, stand up for what they believe in, feel empowered and use the democratic processes to bring the changes.





    ReplyDelete
  2. I think it was Lee Kuan Yew who used the phrase 'benevolent dictator'. Sounds very much like the 'Dadaji' in many Indian families! My point is that sub consciously many Indians are seeking a secure cocoon like the family even in Government. They are willing to forgo a bit of personal liberty if that perceived need for security is met.

    ReplyDelete
  3. With choice comes acceptance of responsibility. I have seen many strong people balk when told "Do as you please."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very true. It's far easier when you just follow orders like the Germans followed Hitler. They disowned moral responsibility for their actions.

      Delete