Thursday, September 20, 2018

The New Middle Class

We recently stayed at a colonial hotel in Darjeeling. The hotel is very la di da and focuses on creating an ambience reminiscent of pre-independence British India complete with afternoon tea and coal fires in all the rooms. It is a small hotel and apart from us and a few westerners, there were a large number of people who were part of a fitness group led by a well known nutritionist. This group was a mixture of people, old and young, and there were children too. Most of the participants were from Gujarat and Maharashtra though there were a few from Kolkata as well. Evidently, anyone who stays at this hotel is reasonably well off as it is an expensive, upscale property.

It was interesting to observe the behaviour patterns of this group vs the other residents of the hotel. All of them took off their footwear before entering any of the rooms. All the floors were carpeted and it was fairly cold so everyone else, including the hotel staff kept their shoes on. Clearly there was some cultural conditioning at work here. The hotel served the finest Darjeeling tea, perfectly brewed and presented without any milk or sugar. This group all asked for masala chai, obviously finding the Darjeeling tea insipid. Further, a sizable chunk of them had strict dietary preferences such as Vegetarian food or a Jain diet. They mostly spoke in Gujarati or Marathi with some Hindi thrown in. Though they were dressed in western clothes mostly, they did not speak English. If they did, it was with a broad regional accent, It would be fair to assume that most of them did not go to the so called 'Convent or Missionary' schools and that they did not have English speaking parents.

Vir Sanghvi's recent article captures the profile of this segment New Middle Class (NMC) and its political leanings. Apart from whether they are English speaking or not, the critical difference between this segment and the Old Middle Class (OMC) seems to be their religious underpinnings. In my view this manifests itself in two ways. Please note that whether they are OMC or NMC, the underlying religion in India is mostly Hindu:

  1. The OMC tends to practice religion intermittently. (There are shades of difference between people in this segment and it is not as black and white as it is presented here) Events like marriages, deaths, and other significant life events are celebrated with full ritual but that's about it. Temple visits are minimal and are more like tourist events. The NMC is certainly more ritualistic and practices religion overtly.
  2. The OMC explicitly states that it is secular. Not everyone is sure of what this means but I presume that in this context it refers to treating people of all religions equally. The NMC does nothing of the kind. The Hindu religion is clearly superior for them and they would, at best, tolerate people from other religions without too much of social mixing.  
It is clear that the OMC is dwindling in numbers. This is the breed which is often derisively referred to as the Lutyens Elite, Presstitutes etc as most of the established civil service and media were from the OMC segment. They are being simply overwhelmed in numbers by the NMC as time goes on. This change has profound implications for India. Perhaps because of the stronger Hindu underpinnings of the NMC they naturally gravitate towards the BJP, a fact that the party has joyfully accepted and exploited. Whether it acts on their aspirations (Mandir in Ayodhya, Common Civil Code, Muscular policy against Muslim separatists in Kashmir, Expelling illegal Bangladeshis etc) or not is still work in progress. It may be argued that a 'strong' pro Hindu policy is easier to articulate when you are in opposition rather when you run the country with a sizable majority.

The opposition parties, specifically the Congress have totally failed to appreciate the growth of the NMC. There is a strong vested interest spearheaded by a section of the English language media (NDTV, Sagarika Ghosh etc) that essentially looks down upon the NMC while deifying the tenets of the OMC. There is also a belief that, with time, the NMC will become like the OMC. That sounds like wishful thinking and is unlikely to happen. In reality the OMC has all but withered away. Unless the opposition parties recognize the growth of the NMC phenomenon they will be unable to strategise on how to deal with it.

The foregoing discussion essentially boils down to changing attitudes towards religious minorities, specifically Muslims. This is indeed the key differentiator between the OMC and the NMC. English speaking is a non issue. Global realities will ensure that English will grow and prosper in India. We have a natural advantage in this respect and it would be foolish to fritter it away. So what do these changing attitudes translate into? In my view there are 4 critical issues:

  1. The perception that the Indian 'secular' state favours religious minorities over Hindus. This perception leads to demands for a 'level playing field' or loosely translated a common civil code (common here would largely equate to a Hindu civil code)
  2. Righting of historical wrongs. This centres around issues like building the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, identifying the Taj Mahal as a Shiv Mandir or changing Muslim place names like Allahabad to Prayagraj 
  3. Rewriting history like defining Maharana Pratap as the victor at Haldighati or highlighting Hindu Kings like Lalitaditya who have been ignored by Colonial and Leftist historians, or insisting that most scientific, medical and other discoveries happened in India
  4. Reforming obscurantist Islam - issues such as the ban to triple talaq or allowing the entry of women into Muslim shrines like Haji Ali.
Where is all this leading? That's a tough question to answer. I am of the very strong opinion that India is a self correcting society. By that I mean a place that does not swing towards extremes. Social revolution, military rule, totalitarian regimes etc will not flourish here simply because of the inherent pluralism of our society. But will we find a new equilibrium where our Hindu identity finds greater focus? Yes, I do think so. What does it mean for us and how will it impact our daily lives only time will tell.


                         Check out my book of nostalgic family tales set in the 1960's in Mussoorie 


                           The book is available as a paperback or Kindle edition on  Amazon 

24 comments:

  1. Spot on , Debu. The profile of the elite is in flux. The post independence elite rushed to step into the shoes of the departing colonial power and claimed as their own not just the physical manifestations of their power, but also the attitudes: the we and them, the rulers and the ruled. This has changed since the liberalisation of 1991. The new money doesn’t see things this way. And as we know money matters.

    Adding to this is the coddling of minorities for their votes, and who vole en block, which has led to a sense amongst even well educated and so called liberal OMC’s that the system is flawed.

    But I share your optimism that balance will be restored. It will take time, we are not a society given to revolutions, thank fully.

    Vijay Sharma

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Given that the departed colonial power is almost in the ICU there's really no role model to hold on to. On a serious note we will hopefully not get into a phase of radical transformation. Incrementalism does have its points!

      Delete
  2. The mentality of the people changes but the fear is the thing which makes them believe to a religion and politicians are basically as you said OMC they tend to exploit this as you said and use us against.

    The new bill of 10% reservation of upper class with economic background are we going upward or just downgrading in the time where it is essential for the reservation to completely perish.

    The Chinese have successfully done this by opressing the individual but at the cost of the individual freedom being lost so it is time we change our attitude and educate our future rather than schools which always tend to change with the government. By the way nice article sir loved it.

    Sai Dhanchander

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your blog reminded me of https://asiasociety.org/excerpt-anand-giridharadas-india-calling. I couldn’t find the section where Anand, a young American of Indian descent, describes, very realistically, an idea very similar to that of NMC and OMC.

    Sankrant Sanu an IITK alumnus, in one of the following makes the point, that rather than English being a natural advantage for India, in fact, has probably contributed to the current poverty in India.   English being the language of higher education has probably prevented a majority of Indian from participating in the country’s economy:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw4YEyAbIdI

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY2KEscyBmM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rqjIqLkp4s

    Thanks for an interesting blog.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There are many comments on this blog that have come on Whats App and E Mail in various groups. I am reproducing some of them below

    [9:10 AM, 1/12/2019] KVN Doss: Thanks indeed for sharing this blog. I am in Manila and will share this with Vick. While the author may be correct and I do hope he is correct especially when he says that India is in a self correcting mode and wants to remedy the injustices inflicted on it. But he has drawn these conclusions by observing just one group from Western India. Can his conclusions be considered rather sweeping? In WB and kerala.this may not be.correct. However let us hope he is correct and the tribe of NMCs increase exponentially.
    [9:11 AM, 1/12/2019] KVN Doss: On Bhatnagar's blog:

    I agree with you broadly on your analysis but I will flavour it with my 66yrs of life lived with eyes open and ears tuned to the surroundings.

    1. OMCs,though had English education by and large, they did cherish their mother tongue and were generally proficient in it.

    OMCs English education was generally imparted by genuine Christian organisations like Society of Jesus, CSI and many Christian missionary schools and their eagerness to convert students were rather subtle and subdued. Even Kanchi Shankaracharya, His holiness Late Chandrasekhara Saraswathi had education in Christian machinery school. Education was not a business but a charitable activity then. Many Muslim and Hindu charitable schools also gave good education. Even Government, Municipality, Corporation schools were manned by forward caste teachers and good education was imparted. Over 70 years education has become a business and private primary and secondary education is dominated now by Christians. Some Hindu and Muslim money making schools are also there too. These Christian school teachers are zealots and proselyters. Added to that are many foreign Christian funded NGOs doing dubious work in India unchallenged. Most states formed on linguistic basis promoted local languages. Only a few states like Andhra and and big cities like Mumbai, Chennai and Bangalore and a few education centred towns like Tirunelveli, Trichy, Mangalore, Mysore, Coimbatore, Gadag, Hubli Dharwad, Pune, Kota, Allahabad to name a few did well. All others widened the gap between good education and bad education. From Andhra, even vernacular students did very well on all India basis like in IITs, IES, IPS etc. TN lost ground.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is just to clarify that the posts with my name are not my opinion but of my acquaintances, which I have forwarded to Debu.

      Thank you
      KVN Doss

      Delete
  5. OMCs were usually had limited income, had large families. They got their religious moorings at home, in neighbourhood temples. Supplemented by news papers and Govt libraries.

    2. NMCs mostly lost touch with mother tongue, embraced English and Hindi, got their religious education from books and Internet if they desired it.

    NMCs have more money, less souls to feed, travel more and learn more of the greatness of India in general and Hindus in particular.

    They have now become aware of govt minority appeasement politics, double standards of psuedo intellectuals (whom they once followed) . Even common laws are selectively applied in India. A skull cap or a cross in your chain will give you immunity against traffic violation fines in most places in India. It is because of Internet

    Yes, there may not be revolution. Unless a fearless, selfless leader arises for unifying Hindus our ills will continue. Govt will continue plunder Hindu temple funds and at the same time spend govt money on the welfare of minorities. Among minorities only two particular communities drain govt funds. Govt will continue to emphasize caste even if you do not notice it in big or small towns.

    Of course Hinduism will be there in Bollywood and in other cinemas too. It gives great unfettered freedom of expression. You can cast a pious Hindu as a villain. You can call anybody 'PREM', 'RAJ','RAHUL' and get away with it. Otherwise , (if you make cinemas on other than Hindu families) you have to get approval from Mullahs, Imams, Cardinals, Fathers etc. Why risk?

    I am happy to note that the group you mentioned followed Hindu culture like removing footwear .
    [9:11 AM, 1/12/2019] KVN Doss: OMC has not put any effort to learn reading and writing their own mother tounge while same time was spent to learn English and other languages.
    [9:11 AM, 1/12/2019] KVN Doss: OMC - had to live with restricted resources and were not given proper exposure whereas NMC has all of them . NMC- next generation especially, are bold enough to question everything and has the technology also to explore. So it's only required to propagate our heritage and culture correctly to them to sustain Hinduism. Knowing English is an added advantage

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is just to clarify that the posts with my name are not my opinion but of my acquaintances, which I have forwarded to Debu.
      Thank you.

      Delete
  6. sushantagrawal@comcast.net
    Sat 1/12/2019, 4:14 AM
    "Nauseating" to one could be exhilarating to another. Here is a review of a novel by an author of SriLankan heritage writing in England:

    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/01/14/a-debut-novel-captures-a-city-on-the-boil

    --- Sushant

    On Jan 11, 2019 10:47 AM, Rajiv Bhatnagar wrote:
    As I agreed: not all Indian English writers are cut from the same cloth. As to meeting Sri Divyaroop, I vaguely remember meeting him long before we both met, in 1971, in E-wing, in early 60's at a common relative's place in Kanpur. After all, we both are Kanpurwallas too!

    From: 76ERS <76ers-bounces@lists.rit.edu> on behalf of Rishiyur Nikhil
    Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 10:00 AM
    To: IIT/K 1971-76 discussion list
    Subject: [76ers] Re: Fwd: The New Middle Class

    > Yes, of course not all Indian English writers are cut from the same cloth.

    Bhatnagar (Rajiv), meet Bhatnagar (Divyaroop), our very own Indian English writer! 😊

    Nikhil

    On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:41 AM Rajiv Bhatnagar wrote:
    Glad to have agreement from a fellow E-winger!

    Yes, of course not all Indian English writers are cut from the same cloth. I have read Vikram Seth's "A Suitable Boy" and agree that it is engaging and authentic, but it did seem too long. The novel may still be lying somewhere in my collection.

    From: 76ERS <76ers-bounces@lists.rit.edu> on behalf of Niraj Jain
    Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 10:22 PM
    To: IIT/K 1971-76 discussion list
    Subject: [76ers] Re: Fwd: The New Middle Class

    Hail brother!! Finally someone who agrees with me on Ms. Roy’s writing style.

    Rajiv Bhai - I don’t think all “Indian English” writers are cut from the same cloth - try reading something by Vikram Seth, or a host of others I can recommend who are far more engaging and natural in their writing style. (And as a bonus, they are not whiners who sit on panels opining on every subject without any solutions to offer :) )

    On Jan 10, 2019, at 5:27 PM, Rajiv Bhatnagar wrote:

    Shrider,

    Glad you liked it. I generally can't read Indian English writers. They seem to understand neither East nor West. Prime example, for me, of course is Arundhati Roy, I did open on of her books, but couldn't get beyond a few pages. Her writing to me seems very artificial and nauseating. However, some Indian American writers, especially the younger ones, are highly readable. They seem very genuine about their experiences, both in the US and India. I had heard about Anand Girdhardas's book just when it came. I got it from our library. He didn't disappoint. You too may like the book. I found his description of what Debu calls the OWC, very interesting and memorable. He seems to imply that the OBC are decadent and artificial, and dependent on their parents wealth. He contrasts them with the confident young desi software engineers of Mumbai. He makes it a point of the fact that the NWC (desi SW Engineers) talk a very different kind of English than the OWC. He lived in Mumbai, for a few years, and worked as a journalist for a big Indian newspaper or magazine.



    From: 76ERS <76ers-bounces@lists.rit.edu> on behalf of Shreeder Adibhatla
    Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 7:40 PM
    To: IIT/K 1971-76 discussion list
    Subject: [76ers] Re: Fwd: The New Middle Class

    Rajiv,
    Thanks for the link to the excerpt from Anand Giridharadas' book. Although it describes the next generation more that it describes ours, it is easy to empathize. Very well written, too.
    Debu,
    Thanks for an interesting blog.

    adiabatic

    ReplyDelete
  7. [11:14 PM, 1/10/2019] Amar Seth: Sri Bhatnagar, your blogs are so thought provoking.
    What’s happening in India seems to be a world wide phenomenon.
    Trump, Brexit, Macron............
    I have a feeling we are seeing the beginnings of a second era of dark ages.
    [11:37 PM, 1/10/2019] Divyaroop Bhatnagar: It's increasingly becoming like the clash of civilizations. The difference being that's it's now sort of like 'Islam vs the Rest'

    ReplyDelete
  8. BD “ Islam vs the rest”?
    It is also Mexicans vs the rest; whites vs the rest; Dalits vs the rest;
    Antinationals vs the rest; the have nots vs the rest; etc
    Maybe In sync with your blog it could be broadly classified as the NMC vs the rest?

    It’s the age of anger. Humanity is unhappy and wants to lash out at those who are responsible.

    ReplyDelete
  9. To begin with, Debu, an excellent blog. Congratulations and look forward to more such insightful pieces.

    Jainy, your comment reminds me of Pankaj Mishra’s “Age of Anger” - highly recommended to all who haven’t yet read it - explains our contemporary world in the historical context.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What causes anger? In most cases a perceived feeling of injustice? That seems quite reasonable when its the minority that feels aggrieved. Why does the majority feel threatened? When their comfort zone is invaded and their superior status is challenged?

    ReplyDelete
  11. blob:https://web.whatsapp.com/2b4c3931-979c-471b-90ea-88a6e4b04a42

    ReplyDelete
  12. Exactly what’s happened in the US , what’s happening with Brexit, Germany right wing and so on.Majority support has been taken for granted by major political parties for long as they seek support from growing minorities.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Here is a longish quote from Pankaj Mishra’s “Age of Anger” which tries to give the causes:
    “. . . There is plainly much more longing than can be realized legitimately . . . more desires for objects of consumption than can be fulfilled by actual income; more dreams than can be fused with stable society by redistribution and greater opportunity; more discontent than can be allayed by politics . . . more demand for status symbols and brand names than can be met by non-criminal ones . . . more stimuli from the news media than can be converted into action; and more outrage than can be expressed by social media.”

    Apologies for the long read but I thought it relevant to our discussions.

    ReplyDelete
  14. In India we have had a PM -MMS- who is on record as saying the minorities have the first right to resources. In Kashmir the Pandits have been ethnically cleansed without a murmur from the OMC’s. there is a litany of complaints the “angry” provide. They feel ignored and taken for granted. We are seeing the consequences of this.

    ReplyDelete
  15. [1:52 PM, 1/10/2019] Dinesh YFactor: Gujaratis, Bengalis and Malayalis are the three linguist groups that have maximum affinity to local languages irrespective of income groups. I saw a very strong impact when I was in newspaper business. As far as traction to religion is concerned, I agree that new generation is more inclined. I guess it kind of started with clear differentiation of caste etc precipitated by fight for reservation culminating in Mandal report. And there has been no looking back since then. How long will it continue is a big question?
    [9:04 PM, 1/10/2019] Sanjay Kumar: Debu: Excellent observation and analysis. PLUs are definitely getting outnumbered by PLTs (To use the terms introduced by Gurusharan Das some years back on the same phenomenon). Perhaps one needs to reflect more on why a majority feels prosecuted. Or maybe, the majority is a myth because there is nothing like a monolithic being called Hindoos as they are actually a fragmented lot. Recent DNA analysis has confirmed that for at least the last 3000 years the society and people of India have been a closed set of endogamous blocks. This is something that modern indian families composed of multicastes and multicultural members have experienced. They come across familial practices totally different and unique even for celebrating the same common religious festivals. I can vouch for that.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Good post Debu. The OMC has now become NUC (new upper class) and a NMC has emerged ? The new NMC has the wealth that the OMC could not dream of. So a re-rating of aspirations is happening all the time. As my friend was telling me how there were four Rolls ans Bentley cars at his party last week in Hyderabad.

    ReplyDelete
  17. [10:24 AM, 1/11/2019] Nandu Kulkarni: We written, Debu. I think where you grew up and live is also a factor, I.e., which neighbourhood. For eg, the OMC in certain parts of Pune, Mumbai, Kolkata etc. are almost 90% far right from a religious point of view. Most are even Hindu chauvinists. Even people originating from these parts who have migrated to US and Europe fall into that pattern.
    [10:24 AM, 1/11/2019] Nandu Kulkarni: Well written...
    [11:03 AM, 1/11/2019] Divyaroop Bhatnagar: Thanks Nandu. You are right.
    [11:06 AM, 1/11/2019] Tuffy: Nandu
    You know I have many friends in Pune and you are bang on the target - they are all similar - very educated and rich people - but extremely opinionated and blinkered!
    Tuffy
    [11:19 AM, 1/11/2019] Neeta Krishna: Very well written.
    About the NMC, having lived in Gujarat for many years even before the saffron wave, I found well off/upper middle class Gujaratis very different from our city stereotypes.
    English was unimportant, not aspirational. Everyone spoke Gujarati, even outsiders, happily. Being in business not employment a mark of success. Dads who were PG engineers qualified in the USA would be proud of kids setting up trading businesses. Loving to travel, with money to spend we'd also encounter them on vacations anywhere.
    But at least in the nineties it was not about religion. Language was a common factor, hindus and muslims spoke to same Gujarati.
    This thing about religion has pervaded OMC too. But maybe not for people like us!

    ReplyDelete